Endless thought for beholder may be allowed in the art world as literalist work. In architecture, minimalist work that develops explained as incomplete without him but when it hosts him it includes him to its world according to Michael Fried.However, such less information it provides in that world for the user, in architecture field, is insufficient or as to say it leaves the user too much blank space to fill out.Yet, mysteriousness and inscrutability are interesting but not for instance the huge white space; labyrinth is preferable. Adversely, when minimalist work contains literally barely information, nothingness arises in place. On the other hand, the case I make instead of minimalist work, labyrinth is also incomplete without Icarus and it containsthe mysterious sense with the complexity instead of nothingness. Because minimalist work relies so much on beholder, the nothingness effect will liberate beholder out of the place.
An inexhaustibility in the huge white space that seems to go on and on distributes nomore or less information though time. Consequently, it does include the user to itsworld not to be part of its world but instead trapping him with his own delusion andthe same information repeated. To some degree without additional information, Thissituation makes the huge white space detach from the user. FOR FULL ARTICLE>CLICK IMAGE ABOVE.
COMPLEXITY AND THE FLOW IN PERCEPTION